Re: [PATCH] pidns: Limit kill -1 and cap_set_all

[Eric W. Biederman]

Kirill Korotaev <dev@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I dislike this patch:
> it's not scalable/efficient to travers all the tasks
> while we know the pid namespace we care about.

Well the unix way is to implement it simple and stupid and then to
optimize, where needed.  We don't currently have a per pid namespace
list of processes or tasks.

This is a trivial bug fix patch, and I wanted the review to be as
simple as possible.

I don't expect people are doing kill -1 all that frequently as it is a
bit rude.

I have no problem doing find_ge_pid and then looking in the hash table
like we do in /proc.  It likely will have fewer conflicts, but that
is a bit harder to review, and is actually more code.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/