Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option

[David Rientjes]

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:

> You don't need to save the entire mask--just note that NODE_MASK_ALL was
> passed--like with my internal MPOL_CONTEXT flag.  This would involve
> special casing NODE_MASK_ALL in the error checking, as currently
> set_mempolicy() complains loudly if you pass non-allowed nodes--see
> "contextualize_policy()".  [mbind() on the other hand, appears to allow
> any nodemask, even outside the cpuset.  guess we catch this during
> allocation.]  This is pretty much the spirit of my patch w/o the API
> change/extension [/improvement :)]
> 

Not really, because perhaps your application doesn't want to interleave 
over all nodes.  I suggested NODE_MASK_ALL as the way to get access to all 
the memory you are allowed, but it's certainly plausible that an 
application could request to interleave only over a subset.  That's the 
entire reason set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAVE) takes a nodemask anyway right 
now instead of just using task->mems_allowed on each allocation.

		David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/