Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)

[Kay Sievers]

On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 16:48 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> I appreciate the sysfs people their opinion that /sys/bdi/ might not be the
> best from their POV, however I'm not seeing where to hook the BDI object from
> so that it all makes sense, a few of the things are currently not exposed in
> sysfs at all, like the NFS and FUSE things.

What happended to the idea to create a "bdi" class, and have the
existing devices as parents, and for stuff that is not (not now, or
never) in sysfs, no parent is set.

Thanks,
Kay

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/