[RFC] create instrumentation/ directory

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Randy Dunlap (rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:19:05 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> > Honestly, I don't care at all about building the code.  If that's what 
> > you want, great.
> 
> Yes, that is wanted.  They bitrot too easily -- not good.
> 
> > My objection is more to adding a samples/ directory, which is contra to 
> > past experience:
> > 
> > A new net driver sample should go in drivers/net/ like the existing 
> > skeleton files I already listed, not samples/net/.  A top-level 
> 
> Can't disagree with that.
> 
> > "samples/" seems like it exists only duplicate the rest of the tree 
> > hierarchy.
> 
> It seems odd to be building code in Documentation/, but I can live
> with that.  It was primarily Christoph who was opposed to that.
> He suggested samples/ and I went along with it just to break the
> impasse (since no one else was making any comments on it at that
> time).
> 
> Sam, would building code in Documentation/ cause problems for
> kbuild?

Since we already have the Instrumentation menu in
kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation and instrumentation code all over the
kernel tree:

arch/*/oprofile/*.c
kernel/kprobes.c
arch/*/kernel/kprobes.c
kernel/marker.c
kernel/profile.c
kernel/profile.S
kernel/lockdep.c
vm/vmstat.c
block/blktrace.c

We could move them to 

instrumentation/
arch/*/instrumentation/

Therefore, we could also move the kprobes and marker samples under

instrumentation/samples/

My main concern is that 15 characters long directory name might be
inelegant (however, it only beats Documentation by 2).

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/