Re: [PATCH 9/9] RT: Only dirty a cacheline if the priority is actuallychanging

[Roel Kluin]

Gregory Haskins wrote:
> We can avoid dirtying a rq related cacheline with a simple check, so why not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
>  0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

I think you wanted a patch here?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/