Re: [PATCH] SPARC64: fix iommu sg chaining

From: Jens Axboe
Date: Wed Oct 17 2007 - 07:14:44 EST


On Wed, Oct 17 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:24:01 +0900
> >
> > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:16:29 +0200
> > > Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 17 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > > > > I would suggest that other sg_last() uses be audited for the same bug.
> > > >
> > > > Agree.
> > >
> > > Only libata, I think.
> >
> > There are a few other spots, like ide-scsi
>
> Oops, I missed that. But seems that we have only three, ide-scsi,
> libata, sparc64 iommu.

And now only ide-scsi and libata, Dave killed sg_last() in sparc64
already. So less than I remember, I'd say kill it NOW...

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/