Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes

[Maciej W. Rozycki]

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> You always put boring, crappy, insufficient text in the for-the-changelog
> section and interesting, useful, sufficient text in the not-for-the-changelog
> section.

 I'll swap the sections in the future then. ;-)  Frankly I was not sure 
whether the changelog was happy about being fed with lengthy explanations 
and it has not spoken out.

 I have to admit this is a habit carried over from the FSF-style ChangeLog 
-- where the enforced rule is actually *not* to provide any explanation 
for why changes are done and only describe what has been modified (with 
any discussion around archived in the respective mailing list).

> But you can't fool me!  I have an editor and I fix it up.

 Thank you and sorry for the extra work I caused you -- I shall keep your 
suggestion in mind in the future.

  Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/