Re: [Celinux-dev] [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival

[Andy Whitcroft]

On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:38:55AM +0200, Michael Opdenacker wrote:

> Andrew, you're completely right... The patches should all aim at being
> included into mainline or die.
> 
> I'm finishing a sequence of crazy weeks and I will have time to send you
> patches one by one next week, starting with the easiest ones.

Well thats good news.  In response to the comments made about testing
the impact of these patches on big-iron I was going to suggest we ask
Andrew to include your patch set in -mm so that it firstly gets at least
compiled on big-iron, and secondly so we could think about how to test
with some of the options enabled on big-iron.

Knowing nothing about these options, from a test perspective it would
be nice if we were able to simply enable "the lot" so we can do "normal"
-mm runs and "tiny" -mm runs without any manual intervention?

-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/