Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX

[Rick Jones]

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:02:00AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>
> > > on UDP/RAW and it's certainly possible to connect() to that. 
> >
> > Where do you get this from?  And where is this implemented?  I don't
>
>
> Sorry it's actually loopback, not broadcast as implemented in Linux.
> In Linux it's implemented in ip_route_output_slow(). Essentially
> converted to 127.0.0.1
>
> I think it's traditional BSD behaviour but couldn't find it on
> a quick look in FreeBSD source (but haven't looked very intensively) 

One has to set their way-back machine pretty far back to find the *BSD 
bits which used 0.0.0.0 as the "all nets, all subnets" (to mis-use a 
term) broadcast IPv4 address when sending.  Perhaps as far back as the 
time before HP-UX 7 or SunOS4.  The bit errors in my dimm memory get 
pretty dense that far back...

It has hung-on in various places (stacks) as an "accepted" broadcast IP 
in the receive path, but not the send path for quite possibly decades now.

rick jones
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/