Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 13:08 +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> > > it does make the API a little more clumsy.
> > 
> > Hmm, we might do something like:
> > 
> > 	timer_gettime(fd | POSIX_TIMER_FD, .....);
> > 
> > So the kernel looks up the fd in order to figure out the timer_id, which
> > needs to be referenced in filep->private_data anyway.
> 
> And you'd need similar for timer_settime() and, perhaps,
> timer_getoverrun().  But it seems slightly ugly, in the same way that
> my idea in option (d) of returning a file descriptor from
> timer_create() seems a slightly ugly.  (And can we guarantee that
> the [timerid] space is distinct from the [fd|POSIX_TIMER_FD] space?)

If we use the most significant bit for POSIX_TIMER_FD, we should be
fine.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/