On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 06:00:57PM +0100, James Pearson wrote:
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Anton Arapov wrote:
Hey guys, the future of this patch is important for me. What do you think, has this patch any chances to be committed to upstream?Looks reasonable to me, except for the one overlong line.
James Pearson <james-p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
There isn't that much that is duplicated - and there are also bits of
the /proc/PID/mem code that are not needed in this case, so I'm not
really sure if it is worth doing.
I did submit a patch a few months ago - see:
<http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117862109623007&w=2>
OK, here is the patch (without the long line) against 2.6.23-rc5 - what else needs to be done to get it committed?
Remove duplicate ptrace_may_attach() checks, unecessary (), {} and
spaces before pointer names -- char *buf.