Re: [PATCH 0/3] cxgb3 driver update

From: Divy Le Ray
Date: Thu Aug 23 2007 - 18:04:06 EST


Hi Al,

Speaking of cxgb3, could you explain what the hell is
static int do_term(struct t3cdev *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
unsigned int hwtid = ntohl(skb->priority) >> 8 & 0xfffff;
doing? AFAIK, skb->priority is not net-endian...


the RDMA connection id is saved in the skb's priority field for TERM messages
because it is not in the CPL message that comes up from the hardware.
Yet the RDMA driver needs it, so sge.c::process_responses() overloads
the skb's priority and csum with these values.



Another odd place is
int t3_seeprom_write(struct adapter *adapter, u32 addr, u32 data)
{ u16 val;
int attempts = EEPROM_MAX_POLL;
unsigned int base = adapter->params.pci.vpd_cap_addr;

if ((addr >= EEPROMSIZE && addr != EEPROM_STAT_ADDR) || (addr & 3)) return -EINVAL;

pci_write_config_dword(adapter->pdev, base + PCI_VPD_DATA,
cpu_to_le32(data));
with callers like
int t3_seeprom_wp(struct adapter *adapter, int enable)
{
return t3_seeprom_write(adapter, EEPROM_STAT_ADDR, enable ? 0xc : 0);

IOW, you really get little-endian values passed to pci_write_config_dword()
and it expects a host-endian as the last argument...


It looks like a bug. Thanks for spotting this.

Cheers,
Divy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/