Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review

[Michal Piotrowski]

On 22/08/07, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>
> > Oops, never mind - tail still follows secmark, so that shouldn't matter.
> > So I'm not sure why we are getting a bad value for secmark here - should
> > be initialized to zero and never modified unless there is an iptables
> > secmark rule.
>
> Michal, do you see this in current git?

No, I do not see this problem in 2.6.23. I had similar problem last
month, but it is fixed now.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/12/362

Regards,
Michal

-- 
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/