Re: [PATCH] Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel

From: Casey Schaufler
Date: Tue Aug 21 2007 - 11:35:53 EST



--- Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> > > Ergo the only
> > > people who should be writing security policy for deployment are those
> > > people who have studied and trained in the stuff. Those people are
> > > also known as "security professionals".
> >
> > If only security professionals can use the system you have failed
> > to provide a general purpose facility. It may have value in limited
> > circumstances but it is not for everybody.
>
> But that's okay. Maybe SElinux is not simple enough to use for
> everyone, but that does not mean you can't auto-generate policy from
> something else, "easy to understand". IOW smack may be great idea,

Thank you.

> but you written it in wrong language. You
> written it in C, while you should have written it in SELinux policy
> language (and your favourite scripting language as frontend).

I have often marvelled at the notion of a simplification layer.
I believe that you build complex things on top of simple things,
not the other way around.


Casey Schaufler
casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/