Re: Fork Bombing Patch

[Jesper Juhl]

(please don't top-post)

On 20/08/07, Anand Jahagirdar <anandjigar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi
>   I think Its not worth to make it configurable just for one printk
> statement. am i missing something?
>

I think you are missing the fact that there are lots of situations
where users may hit the configured process limit without that being an
indication of a fork bomb (or other) attack.
This means that there will be many systems that will trigger your
warning where there really is no problem. That's a good reason for a)
making the message KERN_INFO and b) let administrators somehow disable
it completely.

Personally I'm wondering if we even want/need this at all.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/