Re: [PATCH] RT: Add priority-queuing and priority-inheritance toworkqueue infrastructure

[Gregory Haskins]

On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 23:33 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> OK. I have to take my words back. I completely misunderstood why you
> are doing this and which problems you are trying to solve, my bad.

No problem man.  You found some legitimate problems too so your input is
very much appreciated.

> 
> Perhaps, I am also wrong on the "work_struct's could be re-ordered"
> issue. Yes, we can break the code which is currently correct, that
> was my point. But I must admit, I can't imagine the "good" code mich
> may suffer. Perhaps we can just document the change in behaviour, and
> "deprecate" such a code.
> 
> The only objection (and you seem to agree) is that the "regular"
> queue_work() should not always take the callers's priority as the
> priority of work_struct.

Agreed.  I think that is the right direction (assuming we can resolve
the other problems, like the double queue+queue problem you brought up).

Regards,
-Greg

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/