Re: posible latency issues in seq_read

[Chris Friesen]

Eric Dumazet wrote:

> The problem is in established_get_next() and established_get_first() not 
> allowing softirq processing, while scanning a possibly huge hash table, 
> even if few sockets are hashed in.
>
> As cond_resched_softirq() was added in linux-2.6.11, you probably *need* 
> to check the diffs between linux-2.6.10 & linux-2.6.11

Thanks for the pointers to the likely culprits.

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/