Re: [PATCH] [2/11] x86: Fix alternatives and kprobes to remap write-protected kernel text

From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Mon Jul 23 2007 - 11:26:11 EST


* Andi Kleen (ak@xxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Monday 23 July 2007 16:46:03 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > I would recommend to prefix with __init every function that is assumed
> > "safe" because executed at boot time. It would minimize the risks of
> > buggy usage of these text-modification primitives. That includes
> > text_poke() and a big chunk of the apply alternative code. (it should
> > never be executed on a live system, except at boot time, right ?)
>
> lock prefix patching can happen later on cpu hotplug/unplug event.
>

There seem to be a separate set of functions for applying smp lock
prefixes and more "general" alternatives. I guess the "general"
alternatives and paravirt could be declared __init, and text_poke users
would have to use it responsibly. Such as:

__init apply_alternatives
__init apply_paravirt

non init:
alternatives_smp_*
alternatives_smp_

Mathieu

> -Andi
>

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/