Re: [PATCH RFC] Debug handling of early spurious interrupts

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:09:57 +0900
Fernando Luis V__zquez Cao <fernando@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> With the advent of kdump it is possible that device drivers receive
> interrupts generated in the context of a previous kernel. Ideally
> quiescing the underlying devices should suffice but not all drivers
> do this, either because it is not possible or because they did not
> contemplate this case. Thus drivers ought to be able to handle
> interrupts coming in as soon as the interrupt handler is registered.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> diff -urNp linux-2.6.22-orig/kernel/irq/manage.c linux-2.6.22/kernel/irq/manage.c
> --- linux-2.6.22-orig/kernel/irq/manage.c	2007-07-09 08:32:17.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6.22/kernel/irq/manage.c	2007-07-17 18:37:24.000000000 +0900
> @@ -537,6 +537,29 @@ int request_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_ha
>  
>  	select_smp_affinity(irq);
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_PENDING_IRQ) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ)
> +#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_PENDING_IRQ
> +	if (irqflags & IRQF_SHARED) {
> +		/*
> +		 * It's a shared IRQ -- the driver ought to be prepared for it
> +		 * to happen immediately, so let's make sure....
> +		 * We do this before actually registering it, to make sure that
> +		 * a 'real' IRQ doesn't run in parallel with our fake.
> +		 */
> +#endif /* !CONFIG_DEBUG_PENDING_IRQ */
> +		if (irqflags & IRQF_DISABLED) {
> +			unsigned long flags;
> +
> +			local_irq_save(flags);
> +			handler(irq, dev_id);
> +			local_irq_restore(flags);
> +		} else
> +			handler(irq, dev_id);
> +#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_PENDING_IRQ
> +	}
> +#endif /* !CONFIG_DEBUG_PENDING_IRQ */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_PENDING_IRQ || CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ */

Even if we were going to merge this functionality as-is, I'd ask for some
sort of refactoring to fix up that ifdef maze.

But more substantial issues:

- This is presented as a "debug" feature, but it isn't a debug feature at
  all - it is new functionality which is unrelated to kernel development.

  Also, it is a "debug" feature which provides no debugging!  At the very
  least, one would expect to see it emit a printk to tell people that we
  have some driver which needs fixing.

  Also, this not-really-a-debug-feature is undesirably coupled with a
  real debugging feature: CONFIG_DEBUG_PENDING_IRQ.

- Does this new feature really need its own Kconfig setting?  Why not enable
  it unconditionally?  request_irq() isn't exactly performance-critical.

- If poss, we really do want to find some way of emitting a warning when
  we detect such a device driver.  Like, call the handler and if it
  returned IRQ_HANDLED, start shouting.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/