Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table

[Roman Zippel]

Hi,

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> to sum it up: a nice +19 task (the most commonly used nice level in 
> practice) gets 9.1%, 3.9%, 3.1% of CPU time on the old scheduler, 
> depending on the value of HZ. This is quite inconsistent and illogical.

You're correct that you can find artifacts in the extreme cases, it's 
subjective whether this is a serious problem.
It's nice that these artifacts are gone, but that still doesn't explain 
why this ratio had to be increase that much from around 1:10 to 1:69.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/