Re: removing refrigerator does not help with s2ram vs. fuse deadlocks (was Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway)

From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Sat Jul 07 2007 - 16:15:54 EST


> > One task doing ptrace() can basically do whatever it wants with the
> > task being traced. This is not an exact analogy to what fuse does,
> > but close.
>
> Well, IMO userland tasks should not have power to grab VFS mutexes for
> indefinite ammount of time. ("fused is allowed to deadlock kernel, in
> a way only write to special file helps" is ugly). Unfortunately, I
> don't think there's a way to work around that deadlock within fuse
> design limits... (coda was able to get around it by working on whole
> files granularity, AFAICT), so we'll have to live with that.

That's just file I/O. You can easily deadlock coda with any other
file operation. In fact coda is _less_ robust wrt a misbehaving
userspace server than fuse by a big margin.

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/