Re: [ANNOUNCE] util-linux-ng 2.13-rc1

[Jeff Garzik]

Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > And this is really dumb.  autotools is a completely pain in the ass and
> > > not useful at all for linux-only tools.
> > A myth.  It is quite useful for packagers, because of the high Just
> > Works(tm) factor.  After porting an entire across several revisions of a
> > distro, the autotools-based packages are the ones that work out of the
> > box 90% of the time.
>
> And the 10% where it doesn't work it is a real pain to figure what goes
> wrong due to the completely unreadable Makefiles generated by autotools.
>  After all they are not Makefiles, they are shellscripts embedded into
> Makefiles.
>
> > The other 90% of _my_ time comes from annoying people who roll their own
> > Makefile/build solution, which the packager has to then learn.
>
> Well, it's not *that* hard to write makefiles which follow the usual
> gnuish conventions, so stuff like "make DESTDIR=/tmp/buildroot install"
> works just fine.  That isn't a reason to use autotools.  Especially as
> people get that wrong *even with* autotools from time to time ...

It's not _just_ makefiles, though.  Packaging systems know what to do 
with configure scripts, and automatically plug that into their systems, 
e.g. with rpm's %configure, %make_install, etc.

Having ported an entire distro, the time savings with autotools [OR 
ANOTHER STANDARD BUILD/CONFIGURE SYSTEM] are very real.  Similarly, the 
time sink with each project doing its own home-rolled build/configure 
system is also very real.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/