Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc7

[Ingo Molnar]

* Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > However, it might be worth avoiding the warning, even if it seems 
> > bogus in this case. Christoph? Do you agree with the analysis? And 
> > the patch might be as simple as changing 
> > early_kmem_cache_node_alloc() to enable interrupts at the _end_ of 
> > the function, rather than immediately after calling new_slab().
> 
> new_slab() enables and disables interrupts during usual operations. 
> During bootstrap interrupts are enabled and so new_slab() falsely 
> disables interrupts when we do the alloc by hand thing in 
> early_kmem_cache_node_alloc for NUMA. We need to enable interrupts 
> there since otherwise boot will continue with interrupts disabled.

yeah. Your change looks good to me. You could add a 
local_irq_enable_in_hardirq() to the original place, that will map to a 
local_irq_enable() on non-lockdep kernels and will be a NOP on lockdep 
kernels. (This is a bit hacky though.)

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/