Re: instrumentation and kprobes really still "EXPERIMENTAL"?

[Abhishek Sagar]

On 7/1/07, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> isn't kprobes mature enough to not be considered experimental anymore?

That would vary from arch to arch.

>   in addition, while most of the KPROBES config options depend on
>
>   KALLSYMS && EXPERIMENTAL && MODULES
>
> the s390 architecture depends only on
>
>   EXPERIMENTAL && MODULES
>
> and its instrumentation support is *not* listed as experimental.
>
>   also, the avr32 entry is in the file Kconfig.debug, and depends only
> on DEBUG_KERNEL.  just an observation.

This probably stems from the episodic growth kprobes across different
archs. It can be cleaned up I suppose.

--
Abhishek Sagar

P.S: Adding systemtap in CC.
-
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/