Re: usb-scanner-cameras kernel-2.6.22 and udev-095 problem

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:18:26PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
>  Hi,
> 
>  On 24/05/07, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 07:00:58PM -0500, art@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >  greg
> > >
> > >  and part of /etc/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules
> > >
> > >  ...
> > >  ACTION!="add", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
> > >  SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
> > >
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4100C
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0101", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard Photosmart S20 (C5101A) | Hewlett-Packard Photosmart 
> > S20xi
> > >  (C7150A)
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0102", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4200C | Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4200Cxi |
> > >  Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4200Cse
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0105", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6200C | Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6250C
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0201", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 3300c
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0205", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4300c
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0305", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 5200C
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0401", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 3400c
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0405", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 2100C
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0505", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6300C | Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6350C |
> > >  Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6390C
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0601", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 2200C
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0605", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >
> > >  ...
> > >  # Dell 1600n
> > >  SYSFS{idVendor}=="413c", SYSFS{idProduct}=="5250", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> > >
> > >  LABEL="libsane_rules_end"
> >
> >
> > I don't see anything odd there at all.
> >
> > Can you run 'git bisect' to try to narrow down to the patch that caused
> > the problem?
> 
>  Any progress with this bug?

I haven't heard back from Art, and nothing looks wrong in the rules file
above...

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/