RE: [PATCH] x86_64: remove check for CONSTANT_TSC from time.c

From: Nagendra, Bhavana
Date: Mon Jun 04 2007 - 18:24:36 EST



Yes, the attached patch works for me. Andi, is this patch acceptable?

Regards,
--
Bhavana Nagendra
AMD, Inc



-----Original Message-----
From: Joerg Roedel [mailto:joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 4:42 PM
To: Andi Kleen
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Deguara, Joachim; Nagendra, Bhavana
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: remove check for CONSTANT_TSC from time.c

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:02:40PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 04 June 2007 19:49, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > This patch removes the check for the CONSTANT_TSC cpu flag from
time.c
> > on the x86_64 architecture. At the time this flag is checked at boot
the
> > cpu init code was yet not executed and thus the check fails. At this
> > point the check for VENDOR_AMD and cpu family 0x10 is sufficient.
>
> Wrong fix. The bit just needs to be set earlier in early cpu detect.
Otherwise
> there is a problem again with the next constant TSC AMD CPU.
> I will do that.
>
> -Andi

Ok. But I assume you are meaning something like the attached diff?

Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx>

--
| AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Operating | Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
System | Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
Research | General Partner authorized to represent:
Center | AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
| General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe,
Thomas McCoy


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/