Re: [RFC 1/4] CONFIG_STABLE: Define it

[Dave Jones]

On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:22:02PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
 > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:02:00PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:30:46PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
 > >  > > +	sym = sym_lookup("DEVEL_KERNEL", 0);
 > >  > > +	sym->type = S_BOOLEAN;
 > >  > > +	sym->flags |= SYMBOL_AUTO;
 > >  > > +	p = getenv("DEVEL_KERNEL");
 > >  > > +	if (p && atoi(p))
 > >  > > +		sym_add_default(sym, "y");
 > >  > > +	else
 > >  > > +		sym_add_default(sym, "n");
 > >  > > +
 > >  > 
 > >  > 		sym_set_tristate_value(sym, yes);
 > >  > 	else
 > >  > 		sym_set_tristate_value(sym, no);
 > >  > 
 > >  > should do the trick (untested).
 > > 
 > > Odd. What's the third state ? Undefined?
 > no, mod, yes
 > Representing: no, module, yes as the three config choices.

Now I'm even more puzzled.  Why would 'DEVEL_KERNEL' need
to be modular ?

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/