Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:

[Dave Jones]

On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:22:25AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
 > On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:14:14 -0400
 > Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 > 
 > > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:09:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
 > >  > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 > >  > 
 > >  > Explain what we use Acked-by: for, and how it differs from Signed-off-by:
 > >  > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 > >  > +
 > >  > +If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling of a
 > >  > +patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they can
 > >  > +arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog.
 > > 
 > > Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
 > 
 > What, no Tested-by: ?

Heh. Indeed.  I think there's room for both fwiw.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/