Re: [patch 2/9] Conditional Calls - Hash Table

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Andi Kleen (andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > It's not clear to me why either of those things are necessary. An
> > example please?
> 
> It's certainly possible that a global flag would need to be tested
> more than once.
> 
> I guess it would work if a symbol is associated with a single
> definition. e.g. if there is a DEFINE_COND_CALL() somewhere
> and the individual cond calls reference it.
> 

Yes, but as you have probably understood, I want to have everything
embedded at the cond_call() site rather than polluting the rest of the
code with declarations.

Also, if we have the same cond_calls in different modules, in which
module shall it be defined ?

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/