Re: [patch] sched_clock(): cleanups

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri May 25 2007 - 03:25:31 EST



* Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
>
> On 5/25/07, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >[...]
> >@@ -137,6 +147,7 @@ static void call_r_s_f(void *arg)
> > {
> > struct cpufreq_freqs *freq = arg;
> > unsigned f = freq->new;
> >+
> > if (!f)
> > f = cpufreq_get(freq->cpu);
> > if (!f)
>
> if (!f)
> f = cpufreq_get(freq->cpu);
> if (!f)
> f = tsc_khz;
>
> ?
>
> Something's not quite right here :-)

yeah, that looks like a real bug. When i looked at it during the cleanup
i guess i got distracted by the descriptive function name of
call_r_s_f() ... :-/

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/