> >What about the following enhancement: I check with sig_fatal if it would
> >kill the process and only then emit a message. So when an application
> >takes care itself of handling it nothing is printed.
> >+ /* emit some logging for unhandled signals
> >+ */
> >+ if (sig_fatal(t, sig))
> Not unhandled_signal()?
Can we already use that one in send_signal? As the signal needs to be
send first I think before we know if it was handled or not? sig_fatal
checks if the handler is set to default - which is it is not taken care
of.
> >+ {
> if (sig_fatal(t, sig)) {
> >+ printk(KERN_WARNING "Sig %d send to %d owned by %d.%d (%s)\n",
> s/send/sent/;
> >+ sig, t -> pid, t -> uid, t -> gid, t -> comm);
> t->pid, t->uid, t->gid, t->comm);
Description:
This patch adds code to the signal-sender making it log a message when
an unhandled fatal signal will be delivered.