Re: RFC: kconfig select warnings bogus?

[Satyam Sharma]

On 5/22/07, Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > On 5/22/07, Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> When I said "The standard and maintainable way (for drivers at least)
> >> is..." I didn't mean the example expression, I meant the *direction* in
> >> which the example was stating dependencies.
> >
> > In that case I wish "the points" you make on threads are relevant to them.
>
> My initial reply was on a patch which removed the A-to-B declaration of
> dependency.

And if you think you can have the "direction of declaration of
dependencies" the way you like it, and also (1) preserve current
"select"-like behaviour, (2) introduce no build issues, and (3) get rid of
the bogus warnings, then: Patches are welcome. (No, suggestions that
don't work, or not fully applicable to the case at hand in this thread will
NOT do).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/