Re: second, bigger problem with private futexes

From: Ulrich Drepper
Date: Mon May 21 2007 - 14:27:40 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Do you mean POSIX allowed to mix PROCESS_PRIVATE and PROCESS_SHARED
> condvar and mutexes ? Seems silly to me :(

Don't judge what you don't understand. If all waiters are always in one
process but the notifiers can be in different processes, this setup
might make a lot of sense.

- --
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGUeRK2ijCOnn/RHQRAqRuAKCpc7cmhsnwfclz1DU81RNXRjm68ACgosZc
RqWca4r+Ya54dp5zNztkYuk=
=sW/1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/