Re: [SMP BUG] [clockevents: i386 drivers patch] introduces irqbalance-does-not-work-properly problem

From: Komuro
Date: Mon May 21 2007 - 08:08:57 EST


On Sun, 20 May 2007 15:47:04 +0200
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> And how exactly is this related to clock events ?

Maybe, side-effects.

I will re-analyze this problem.

Thanks.


Best Regards
Komuro


> On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 19:48 +0900, Komuro wrote:
> > The problem is CPU1 receives 38239 interrupt-16
> > but CPU0 receives only 15 interrupt-16
> > CPU0 should receive more interrupts.
> >
> > CPU0 CPU1
> > 0: 85 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
> > 1: 0 698 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> > 6: 0 5 IO-APIC-edge floppy
> > 8: 0 1 IO-APIC-edge rtc
> > 9: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
> > 12: 0 114 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> > 14: 369 2281 IO-APIC-edge ide0
> > 15: 0 24 IO-APIC-edge ide1
> > 16: 15 38239 IO-APIC-fasteoi yenta, pcnet_cs <<< problem
> > 17: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi yenta
> > NMI: 0 0
> > LOC: 50548 50547
> > ERR: 0
> > MIS: 15503
>
> And how exactly is this related to clock events ?
>
> tglx
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/