Re: [xfs-masters] Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 08:11:42PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> Christoph - this is an interaction with xfs_buf_associate_memory();
> I'm not sure what it is doing is at all safe now that it never gets
> passed kmem_alloc()d memory - it works for the log recovery case
> because we use it in pairs - once to shorten the buffer and then once
> to put it back the way it was.
> 
> But that doesn't work for the log buffers (we never return them to their
> original state) and the log wrap case looks to work mostly by accident
> now (and could posibly lead to double freeing pages)....
> 
> It seems that what we really need with the new code is a xfs_buf_clone()
> operation followed by trimming the range to what the secondary I/O needs
> to span. This would work for the log buffer case as well. Your thoughts?

xfs_buf_associate_memory is a mess.  My original plan was to get rid of
it, but I kept that out to keep that patchset small and easily reviable,
but it seems like that was a mistake.  My plan is the following:

 - xlog_bread and thus the whole buffer I/O path grows an iooffset
   paramater that specifies at which offset into the buffer we start
   the actual I/O.  That gets rid of all the xfs_buf_associate_memory
   memory uses in the log recovery code
 - add a buffer clone operation as suggested by you above, and use
   the offset in xlog_sync aswell.

until then you patch below looks fine.
   
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/