why only one use of "create_freezeable_workqueue"?

[Robert P. J. Day]

  hoping to avoid the madness following my earlier, innocuous question
about the lonely, defconfig'ed module scsi_wait_scan.ko, i'm curious
about why there is, in the entire tree, just one invocation of
"create_freezeable_workqueue":

$ grep -rw create_freezeable_workqueue *
drivers/misc/tifm_core.c:       workqueue = create_freezeable_workqueue("tifm");
include/linux/workqueue.h:#define create_freezeable_workqueue(name) __create_workqueue((name), 1, 1)
$

  not that there's anything wrong with that, but i'm just curious as
to why there's only one application of that feature in the whole tree.

rday

-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/