Re: building i386 requires s390: "driver/crypto/Kconfig" sourcings390 arch

[Randy Dunlap]

Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 18 May 2007 14:46:02 -0700 Linda Walsh wrote:
>
> > > If the standard that other architectures are using is to put their
> > > devices in the crypto directory, then one might expect all crypto
> > > devices to be there.  Why should s390 stick out and put its crypto
> > > device someplace under the s390 tree, forcing parts of the s390
> > > tree to be included when building other architectures?
> > drivers/crypto/ currently contains drivers for x86_32 and s390 (the
> > latter by indirection, which is what is causing you this
> > grief/problem/whatever), but it certainly looks like it could be a
> > home for crypto drivers on any arch.
>
> this all sounds vaguely familiar.  oh, wait ...
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/28/212

I just tried several things to "fix" it, but none of them worked.

I wouldn't mind making missing files in *config be non-fatal, i.e.,
just print a warning message, but I doubt that the maintainer(s)
would accept that.

--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/