RE: bug seen with dynticks from CONFIG_HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 17:24 -0500, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> > This is the original ARM dyntick stuff, right ?
> 
> Yes this is a version is not using clocksource.
> 
> > The dyntick support on your architecture is broken. Why does it fiddle
> > with the timer, when the system is not idle ?
> 
> I can't yet run the test sequence on the latest kernel so I'll have to
> wait to experiment.  A brief look at the new code seems to show a
> similar path but I need to actually run though it to understand better.
> 
> 
> On the irq_resend() path handle_dynamic_tick() is still called as
> before. 

No. NOHZ makes handle_dynamic_tick() a NOP. handle_dynamic_tick()
depends on CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ, which is not used when NOHZ is active.

The problem could only arise, when something would disable/enable the
timer interrupt.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/