Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three

[JÃrn Engel]

On Wed, 16 May 2007 15:36:44 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 5/16/07, JÃrn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >More trouble?
> 
> Forgot to add (see below). Seems logfs_segment_read would be simpler
> too if you fixed this.

Would it?  I think that code would still be needed, although possibly in
a different function.

There are two minor drawbacks to using the page cache, btw:
- Indirect blocks need some mapping too.  So either I need to steal a
  bit from the inode space or from the fpos space.
- OOM handling is a bit more complicated.  I would need a mempool for
  that.

> >[ Objects are the units that get compressed.  Segments can contain both
> >compressed and uncompressed objects. ]
> >
> >It is a trade-off.  Each object has a 24 Byte header plus X Bytes of
> >data.  Whether the data is compressed or not is indicated in the header.
> 
> Was my point really. Why do segments contain both compressed and
> uncompressed objects?

Compressing random data will actually enlarge it.  If that happens I
simply store the verbatim uncompressed data instead and mark it as such.

There is also demand for a user-controlled bit in the inode to disable
compression completely.  All those .jpg, .mpg, .mp3, etc. just waste
time by trying and failing to compress them.

JÃrn

-- 
Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work
together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a
universal interface.
-- Doug MacIlroy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/