Re: Why ssse3?

From: Ulrich Drepper
Date: Wed May 02 2007 - 18:57:14 EST


Andi Kleen wrote:
> Nope. SSE3 != SSSE3. The additional S means Supplemential.
>
> It's probably because the few changes didn't justify a SSE4

OK, the problem is that the actual sse3 bit is misnamed. According to
Intel's docs bit 0 of ECX is "sse", the kernel uses "pni". Too bad.

--
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature