Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8

[hui]

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:57:14PM -0400, Ting Yang wrote:
>  Based on my understanding, adopting something like EEVDF in CFS should 
> not be very difficult given their similarities, although I do not have 
> any idea on how this impacts the load balancing for SMP. Does this worth 
> a try?
> 
>  Sorry for such a long email :-)

An excellent long email. Thanks.

Have you looked at Con's SD ? What did you think about it analytically
and do you think that these ideas could be incorporated into that
scheduler ?

bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/