Re: [d_path 0/7] Fixes to d_path: Respin

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 09:04:06PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > It is unspecified whether all members of the statvfs structure have
> > meaningful values on all file systems.
> 
> In my opinion, the advantage of not reporting bogus pathnames in /proc/mounts 
> by far outweighs the problems is sometimes causes for fstatvfs(). Anyone 
> relying on the information obtained from statvfs / fstatvfs is making false 
> assumptions anyway, and in "normal setups" as you called them, nothing 
> changes for fstatvfs and statvfs.

So what about stopping the flaming here and implementing real statvfs/
fstatvfs syscalls instead of these horrible hacks glibc has to do currently?
Using our kstatfs infrastructure that should be dirt simple.
arch/sparc64/solaris/fs.c already has a template of a statvfs syscall for
solaris, although we could probably improve a little on that.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/