Re: [PATCH 3/3] introduce HIGH_ORDER delineating easily reclaimableorders

[Andrew Morton]

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:28:43 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It would have been better to have patched page_alloc.c independently, then
> to have used HIGH_ORDER in "lumpy: increase pressure at the end of the inactive
> list".

Actually that doesn't matter, because I plan on lumping all the lumpy patches
together into one lump.

I was going to duck patches #2 and #3, such was my outrage.  But given that
it's all lined up to be a single patch, followup cleanup patches will fit in
OK.  Please.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/