Re: [RFC PATCH(experimental) 2/2] Fix freezer-kthread_stop race

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > I mean, we already have four of them (PF_NOFREEZE, PF_FROZEN, 
> > > PF_FREEZER_SKIP, TIF_FREEZE), and you will need to introduce two 
> > > more for the freezer-based CPU hotplug, so if yet another one is 
> > > needed, that will make up almost a separate u8 field ...
> > 
> > I am perfectly ok with it. But I am not sure if everybody would 
> > agree to have another field in the task struct, though in this case 
> > it does make sense :-)
> 
> OK by me.  You might want to consider making that fields's locking 
> protocol be set_bit(), clear_bit(), etc rather than task_lock().

is OK to me too, the extra field isnt a problem.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/