Re: SLUB: kmem_cache_destroy doesn't - version 2.

[Neil Brown]

On Thursday April 19, clameter@xxxxxxx wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
> 
> > Not sure how best to fix this one.... kmem_cache_destroy currently
> > doesn't know which alias is being destroyed.
> 
> The aliases are there for decorative purposes when running without
> debugging. If one switches on debugging then it matters but then the
> symlinks are not created since there will be no aliases.
> 
> I guess we can ignore the problem?

Maybe....
But then if we create the same cache with a different size, we might
need to create a directory in sysfs, but there is already a symlink
there... 
It doesn't feel very clean.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/