Re: AppArmor FAQ

[James Morris]

On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:

> In article <Line.LNX.4.64.0704180935100.25495@xxxxxxx> you wrote:
> > Perhaps -- until your httpd is compromised via a buffer overflow or 
> > simply misbehaves due to a software or configuration flaw, then the 
> > assumptions being made about its use of pathnames and their security 
> > properties are out the window.
> 
> Hu? Even a compromised httpd (especially a compromised httpd) is bound to
> the app armor policies. This means it cannot (for example) write to
> /var/www/* - if it never needed to at normal/profiling time.

This has been addressed several times already, please read the full 
thread.



- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/