Re: [PATCH] Show slab memory usage on OOM and SysRq-M

[Eric Dumazet]

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:17:19 +0300 (EEST)
Pekka J Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > This nr_pages should be in struct kmem_list3, not in struct kmem_cache, 
> > or else you defeat NUMA optimizations if touching a field in kmem_cache 
> > at kmem_getpages()/kmem_freepages() time.
> 
> We already touch ->flags, ->gfpflags, and ->gfporder in kmem_getpages(). 
> Sorry for my ignorance, but how is this different?
> 

Those fields are read. Thats OK, because several CPUS might share all those without problem.

But modifying one field in kmem_cache would invalidate one cache line for all cpus that would have to reload it later.

This is what we call "false sharing" or cache line ping pongs


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/