Re: [PATCH] Show slab memory usage on OOM and SysRq-M

From: Pekka Enberg
Date: Tue Apr 17 2007 - 09:23:09 EST


Hi,

On 4/17/07, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@xxxxx> wrote:
The out_of_memory() function and SysRq-M handler call
show_mem() to show the current memory usage state.

This is also helpful to see which slabs are the largest
in the system.

Makes sense.

On 4/17/07, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@xxxxx> wrote:
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index 21b3c61..9a5829a 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -749,6 +749,7 @@ static inline void init_lock_keys(void)
* 2. Protect sanity of cpu_online_map against cpu hotplug events
*/
static DEFINE_MUTEX(cache_chain_mutex);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cache_chain_lock);

So, now we have two locks protecting cache_chain? Please explain why
you can't use the mutex.

+static unsigned long get_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
+{
+ unsigned long slabs;
+ struct kmem_list3 *l3;
+ struct list_head *lh;
+ int node;
+
+ slabs = 0;
+
+ for_each_online_node (node) {
+ l3 = cachep->nodelists[node];
+ if (l3 == NULL)
+ continue;
+
+ spin_lock(&l3->list_lock);
+ list_for_each (lh, &l3->slabs_full)
+ slabs++;
+ list_for_each (lh, &l3->slabs_partial)
+ slabs++;
+ list_for_each (lh, &l3->slabs_free)
+ slabs++;
+ spin_unlock(&l3->list_lock);
+ }
+
+ return slabs * ((PAGE_SIZE << cachep->gfporder) +
+ (OFF_SLAB(cachep) ? cachep->slabp_cache->buffer_size : 0));
+}

Considering you're doing this at out_of_memory() time, wouldn't it
make more sense to add a ->nr_pages to struct kmem_cache and do the
tracking in kmem_getpages/kmem_freepages?

I would also drop the OFF_SLAB bits because it really doesn't matter
that much for your purposes. Besides, you're already per-node and
per-CPU caches here which attribute to much more memory on NUMA setups
for example.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/