Re: [Patch -mm 3/3] RFC: Introduce kobject->owner for refcounting.

[Rusty Russell]

On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 15:53 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> The fundamental rule is that whenever you hand out a pointer to a routine
> living in a module, the receiver has to increment the module's refcount.  
> But the driver core violates this rule all over the place.

Hi Alan,

	Your rule is overly simplistic, unfortunately.  You have two choices:
take a reference count, *or* ensure that the reference will go away when
the module's cleanup routine is called.  Network drivers are a classic
example of the latter.

	Note that you cannot do both: if the cleanup routine calls something
which drops a reference count, it implies that the cleanup routine needs
to be called with non-zero reference count, and it won't be (ignoring
--force).

I hope that clarifies?
Rusty.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/