Re: [patch] high-res timers: UP resume fix

[Ingo Molnar]

* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > We do in on_each_cpu() unconditionally. I missed that.
> 
> BTW, the on_each_cpu() in clock_was_set() is unnecessary, because 
> timekeeping_resume() is always run on one CPU.

yes - but that's not the only place where we do clock_was_set(), and the 
on_each_cpu() is necessary in every other case. So i think the right 
solution was the patch i did: to split the resume functionality from the 
clock_was_set() functionality.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/